- Home
- M. C. Bishop
Gladiators
Gladiators Read online
casemate Short history
glaDiators
Fighting to the Death
in anCient roMe
M. c. Bishop
Oxford & Philadelphia
Published in Great Britain and
the United States of America in 2017 by
CASemAte PUBliSherS
The Old Music Hall, 106–108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JE, UK
1950 Lawrence Road, Havertown, PA 19083, USA
© Casemate Publishers 2017
Paperback Edition: ISBN 978-1-61200-513-3
Digital Edition: ISBN 978-1-61200-514-0 (epub)
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying,
recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without
permission from the publisher in writing.
A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library
Printed in the Czech Republic by FINIDR, s.r.o.
Typeset in India by Lapiz Digital Services, Chennai
For a complete list of Casemate titles, please contact:
CASEMATE PUBLISHERS (UK)
Telephone (01865) 241249
Email: [email protected]
www.casematepublishers.co.uk
CASEMATE PUBLISHERS (US)
Telephone (610) 853-9131
Fax (610) 853-9146
Email: [email protected]
www.casematepublishers.com
Contents
Timeline
4
Technical glossary
6
1. Introduction
9
2. Origins
14
3. Rise of the gladiators
28
4. At the peak
41
5. Hardware and venues
66
6. Life as a gladiator
111
7. The end of the gladiators
147
Sources 155
Note on translations
157
Index
158
275 BC
Manius Curius Dentatus fi rst displays elephants
in a triumph in Rome (Italy)
264 BC
First recorded public gladiatorial combat in the
Forum Boarium
216 BC
First gladiatorial combat staged in the Forum
tiMeline
Romanum
206 BC
Scipio Africanus holds games for his father and
uncle at New Carthage (Spain)
186 BC
Marcus Fulvius Nobilior stages fi rst wild beast
hunt in Rome
167 BC
Elephants fi rst used to trample Roman army
deserters
105 BC Publius Rutilius Rufus turns to gladiatorial
instructors to train Roman legionaries
80 BC
Stone amphitheatre built at Pompeii (Italy)
73–71 BC Revolt of Spartacus
52 BC
First timber amphitheatre recorded
46 BC
Caesar holds games which include a naumachia
(sham naval battle) on the Campus Martius
29 BC
First stone amphitheatre built in Rome
2 BC
Augustus stages a naumachia across the Tiber
AD 21
Revolt of Florus and Sacrovir in Gaul
AD 52
Claudius stages a naumachia on the Fucine Lake
AD 57
Nero holds games including a naumachia in his
new wooden amphitheatre
AD 59
Riot at Pompeii; games in the amphitheatre there
banned for ten years
AD 62
Earthquake at Pompeii and the ban on games is
lifted
AD 70
(approximately) Timber amphitheatre built at
London (UK)
4 | GLADIATORS
AD 72
Flavian Amphitheatre (Colosseum) inaugurated
AD 75
Stone amphitheatre built at the legionary fortress
of Caerleon (UK)
AD 79
Amphitheatre at Pompeii buried by the eruption
of Vesuvius
AD 158
Galen starts work on gladiators
AD 177
Limit on expenditure on gladiatorial games
AD 200
Septimius Severus bans female gladiators
AD 248
Philip the Arab’s Secular Games
AD 404
Gladiatorial games supposedly banned in Rome
by Honorius
AD 1823 Amphitheatre at Pompeii rediscovered
AD 1864 Gladiatorial barracks at Pompeii excavated
AD 1872
Pollice Verso painted by Jean-Léon Gérôme
AD 1933 James Leslie Mitchell (alias Lewis Grassic
Gibbon) publishes his Spartacus novel
AD 1951 Howard Fast publishes his Spartacus novel
AD 1960 Stanley Kubrick’s Spartacus released
AD 2000 Ridley Scott’s movie Gladiator released
TIMeLIne | 5
teChniCal glossary
There are a number of Latin words that occur repeatedly
in the following. Rather than try to find English equivalents, it
seems much easier to retain the original terms.
aedile ( aedilis)
magistrate responsible for organising
munera
amphitheatrum amphitheatre
armatura
weapons drill; type of gladiator or
style of fighting
auctoratus
a free man who fights as a gladiator
balteus
broad metal belt worn by gladiators
bestiarius
animal fighter
bustuarii
early nickname for gladiators
(‘cremation-pit boys’)
caesim
cutting or chopping with a sword
cena libera
public meal for gladiators the
evening before a fight
censor
magistrate responsible for the census
and public morality
dictata
‘the rules’, a formulaic series of
offensive and defensive moves
doctor trainer
6 | GLADIATORS
editor
overall organiser of a munus
gladius
sword (generally used of the short
sword)
lanista
owner or manager of a ludus
libellus
booklet with details of the gladiator
pairings
ludus
gladiatorial school
ludi
gladiatorial games
missio
dismissal alive after a combat
munus
gladiatorial games
naumachia
mock naval battle
noxii
condemned men and prisoners of
war sentenced to the arena
palus stake
(as high as a person) against which a
gladiator trained
parmularii
small-shield fighters (and their
followers)
pollice verso
gesture with the thumb to indicate
death or survival
pompa
procession before games begin
prolusio
prolo
gue to gladiatorial combat
fought with dummy weapons
primus palus
top-ranking gladiator in a ludus
probatio armorum
inspection of weaponry before
combat
pugio dagger
punctim
stabbing with a sword (or dagger)
rudis
double-weight wooden sword
used for training, awarded upon
retirement
sacramentum gladiatorum oath taken by gladiators
scutarii
big-shield fighters (and their
followers)
scutum shield
spectacula
gladiatorial show; old name for
amphitheatre
TechnIcAL GLOSSARy | 7
subligaculum
loin cloth or breech cloth worn by
gladiators
summa rudis umpire
tiro
recruit, greenhorn
velaria
awning made up of many vela (see
velum)
velum
one panel of the velaria; plural vela
venator hunter
veteranus
experienced gladiator
vomitoria
exits from an amphitheatre
8 | GLADIATORS
CHApTeR 1
INTRODUCTION
History does not permit peoples to be judged
by a simple good or bad mark.
Michael Grant, Gladiators
Who was a gladiator?
After all, what has Norbanus ever done for us? He produced some
decayed twopenny-halfpenny gladiators, who would have fallen fl at
if you breathed on them; I have seen better ruffi ans turned in to fi ght
the wild beasts. He shed the blood of some mounted infantry that
might have come off a lamp; dunghill cocks you would have called
them: one a spavined mule, the other bandylegged, and the holder
of the bye, just one corpse instead of another, and hamstrung. One
man, a Th racian, had some stuffi ng, but he too fought according to
the rule of the schools. In short, they were all fl ogged afterwards.
How the great crowd roared at them, ‘Lay it on!’ Th ey were mere
runaways, to be sure. ‘Still,’ says Norbanus, ‘I did give you a treat.’
Yes, and I clap my hands at you. Reckon it up, and I give you more
than I got. One good turn deserves another.
–Petronius, Satyricon 45
Reading this passage, from one of the fi rst prose novels in the
western world, is one way to judge the distance between us and
CHApTeR 1: InTRODuCTIOn | 9
the people of Rome. The familiarity of the speaker with what he is
describing – entertainment provided by men fighting for their lives
– helps render what he is describing everyday and unsurprising. His
tone is that of the football pundit on the couch, which is the thing
that strikes an uncomfortable familiarity for us too, because on one
level, we can understand this: the team was mostly useless, although
the Thracian showed some gumption, and the crowd were not
impressed either; the gladiators did not really earn their applause.
The Latin word gladiator originally meant ‘sword-fighter’, deriving
from gladius, which meant any sort of sword. Over time, the word
gladius was often associated with the classic short sword wielded by
Roman legionaries, often known as the gladius Hispaniensis (‘Spanish
sword’) and this is indeed what we find many early gladiators using.
However, the label gladiator was extended to cover a range of types
of performance artists who competed in the life-and-death struggles
of the arena, many of them never even using swords. One of the
most famous types of gladiator – not least because one was played by
Woody Strode in Stanley Kubrick’s Spartacus – was the retiarius or
‘net-man’. Armed with his weighted net and trident (both possibly
modelled on the equipment of fishermen), he would attempt to
trip or engulf his opponent with his net, whilst keeping him at a
distance (and finally dealing a deadly blow) with his trident. There
were variants on the type – one who used a lasso instead of a net and
one who stood on a platform and threw stones – but there was little
doubt in the minds of the Romans that a retiarius, despite his lack
of a sword, was a gladiator.
Men who fought each other were not the only type of gladiator.
Those who fought wild animals ( bestiarii) or participated in hunts
in the arena ( venatores) were also included, to judge from the fact
that they had their own training school. There are even sculpted
reliefs showing men equipped as gladiators locked in combat with
big cats, so there is no doubt that this was seen as ‘gladiatorial’
by the Romans themselves. It is sometimes difficult for us to
distinguish between bestiarii and venatores and it is by no means
clear that the Romans were either certain or consistent in making
that distinction.
10 | GLADIATORS
There were also men who fought against each other who were
not gladiators. Usually condemned criminals or prisoners of war,
they were given none of the training or privileges of gladiators, but
instead were expected to fight enthusiastically, usually in recreations
of great battles from the past (although normally not major Roman
defeats like the Battles of Caudine Forks, Cannae, or Trasimene, for
fairly obvious reasons). These might be land battles, complete with
scenery, or even (from the time of Julius Caesar onwards) naval
engagements known as naumachia. Alongside those condemned
to play a part in a gruesome piece of historical re-enactment, there
were also those sentenced to be killed ad bestias. Being torn apart by
wild animals was yet another form of entertainment provided for
the crowd, rendered all too familiar by tales of Christian martyrs
forced to die in this way. All of these unfortunates had just one
thing in common: nobody was looking for the skill or finesse of the
gladiator, they were just there to be slaughtered.
Finally there were gladiators who provided light relief, rather
than gory scenes of death, and these included the paegnarii (who
fought each other with sticks) or the andabatae, who duelled (or,
rather, attempted to do so) in helmets with no eye holes.
All of these categories of more-or-less deadly entertainment
were to be found in what we call the ‘games’ but Romans
referred to as munera. A munus was another word whose
meaning evolved over time. It started out as an obligation or
duty, usually on the part of a politician, to provide a service.
This developed from providing funeral games in honour of a
notable deceased figure into putting on entertainment for the
masses. Finally, munera became synonymous with the games and
interchangeable with the word ludi (a ludus was a gladiatorial
training school, but ludi in the plural were always games). They
became staggeringly expensive to stage, could last for weeks and
often imposed a logistical strain on the entire Roman Empire
just to provide entertainment in the capital. However, the
games were an integral and pervasive aspect of
Roman life that
inevitably impinges on our perception of the people and their
time: who can think of Rome without thinking of gladiators?
CHApTeR 1: InTRODuCTIOn | 11
The fascination of gladiators
What is it about gladiators that fascinates us still? The Romans
experienced a perplexing ambivalence towards them, at once once
fascinated and revolted by gladiators. The fact that some free men
(and even women) chose to sign up for the life demonstrates just
how powerful the pull of the arena could be for some. In the most
extreme cases, an emperor might choose to join in. However, whilst
it was not thought acceptable for an emperor to fight as a gladiator,
there seemed to be no objection to training in one of the particular
variants of gladiatorial combat. As we shall see, it was thought to
be a clear benefit that Roman soldiers were trained in this way. The
shame all seems to have come from being seen to compete in public.
Modern ‘civilised’ people like to think that they have risen above
this sort of thing and that watching large numbers of people being
killed is not something we would do. Yet we are quite content to
watch it in the cinema or on television. One famous study from
1976 estimated that, by the time they graduated from high school,
the average American child had seen 13,000 simulated deaths on
television. Other studies noted that violence in prime-time dramas
was often glamorised, whilst in children’s cartoons it was trivialised.
In 2012, another study (by an online undertaker) was published,
revealing that in 2011 a single week’s viewing of 40 monitored
programmes produced 132 simulated dead human bodies.
Of course, we all know these are not real dead bodies and that the
actors get up again and go home at the end of a day’s shoot. But are
we not a little bit inured to the spectacle of death and just ever so
slightly intrigued by the deaths of gladiators, mostly anonymised
behind their large, visored helmets? Is it part of the fascination
of gladiators that we identify to some extent with those ancient
Roman audiences? In other words, are we closer to the crowd
attending a gladiatorial contest than we might care to admit?
Modern histories
We have come a long way from when Michael Grant’s Gladiators
was about the only popular book available on the subject. Now
12 | GLADIATORS
there are many, but still comparatively few that systematically
examine the history of gladiatorial combat from its inception to
its end. It is important to consider the historical development of